Waste Management (WM) is not widely known by dividend investors, but its moat and consistency are remarkable.
As the largest integrated waste management company in the country, WM possesses several key advantages that have enabled it to increase its dividend for 13 consecutive years.
While WM’s operating history isn’t as long as some other companies, its economies of scale, durability, unique assets, consistent free cash flow generation, and mission-critical services make the company one of our favorite blue chip dividend stocks.
WM is the biggest integrated waste management company in North America and serves more than 21 million residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal customers. The company makes money by entering into contracts with customers to collect, transport, process, store, and dispose of their waste. WM owns a variety of assets to run its business, including landfills, truck fleets, transfer stations, recycling facilities, processing plants, and more.
2014 Revenue Mix: collection 54%, landfill 18%, transfer 9%, recycling 9%, other 10%.
2014 Collection Revenue Mix: commercial 40%, residential 30%, industrial 26%, other 4%
The trash business might appear to be a commodity industry at first glance, but it actually has substantial barriers to entry. As the largest player in the market, WM also carries several additional advantages.
First, it’s worth mentioning that there really aren’t any alternatives to trash disposal today. Consumers, municipalities, and businesses need to have their waste collected and taken off-site. With the average American generating several pounds of trash per day, there is a constant need for WM’s services.
All we see is a garbage truck that picks up our garbage can and drives on, but where does our trash really go? This is when WM’s valuable, hard-to-replicate network of assets comes into play.
Waste that is not recycled or processed into forms of energy is taken to transfer stations, which consolidate waste into larger, long distance trucks. These trucks take the waste to distant disposal facilities and landfills.
WM owns 252 landfills, more than its next two largest competitors combined. The number of landfills has fallen from over 7,600 in the mid-1980s to about 1,900 in 2013. That’s over a 75% decrease in less than 30 years! Government regulations, neighborhood restrictions, high start-up costs, and environmental concerns have all played a factor in the decline of available landfills.
While the remaining landfills are larger and more efficient than their predecessors, there are only so many places that waste management companies can park trash. WM’s competitors must pay WM a “tipping fee” to deposit waste at its landfills and use its transfer stations.
WM’s ownership of key assets, dense waste collection network, and tipping fees allow it to maintain a lower cost profile than its peers. This results in more waste volumes from customers (greater route density) and higher returns on its capital.
In addition to the toll-taking advantage WM has, new entrants also have a challenging time winning enough business to justify the significant investment needed to construct for their own disposal facilities. WM and other players already have contracts with customers, which typically last anywhere from two to six years.
WM has noted that more than 80% of its commercial and industrial customers have a contract length greater than three years, and the typical customer stays with WM for 10 years. New entrants have a difficult time securing the cash flow streams necessary to build their own trash disposal network.
Furthermore, WM’s large network of recycling facilities, transfer stations, and landfills make its business more flexible to meet the needs of virtually any customer segment – municipalities, construction sites, healthcare facilities, commercial buildings, and many others. Generally speaking, customers prefer to contract with proven operators that can meet a variety of needs.
WM’s revenue growth is somewhat impacted by the amount of goods consumed by consumers and businesses. When economic activity slows, less trash is produced and WM is not as busy. However, its trucks still run their routes and incur the same operating costs, somewhat crimping profitability.
Besides economic activity, solid waste volumes are gradually impacted by more efficient product packaging and the level of recycling activity, which diverts trash away from landfills.
Landfills have also received increasing scrutiny from governments regarding their impact on the environment, further accelerating the trend towards recycling and what are known as waste-to-energy (WTE) plants, which generate electricity from waste and sell it to customers such as utilities.
Importantly, WM is the largest residential recycler in North America and has the financial firepower to invest in whatever operations are needed to maintain its moat. The company is also a leading renewable energy provider.
If anything, we think the (slowly) increasing shift towards recycling and renewables will further strengthen the market positions of the biggest players because smaller competitors are unable to make the vertical integration investments needed to compete.
Whether or not these activities will be equally profitable is another question, but WM should find a way to stay relevant with its scale and collection of assets.
Additionally, lower commodity prices are hurting WM’s recycling operations (9% of sales). While not much can be done about this in the near term, WM is structuring new contracts and renewals to help it better deal with price volatility in the future and is improving operational efficiency.
WM’s management team is focused on improving the company’s return on invested capital, and we trust them to make the best decisions possible as it relates to recycling and WTE activities, which seem to have a more volatile return profile.
The company decided to divest a meaningful portion of its WTE business in late 2014 for $1.9 billion to maximize its focus on the core business, reduce earnings volatility, and improve its returns. We expect management to remain conservative with how they run the business and adapt to evolving waste management trends.
We analyze 25+ years of dividend data and 10+ years of fundamental data to understand the safety and growth prospects of a dividend. WM’s long-term dividend and fundamental data charts can all be seen by clicking here.
Dividend Safety Score
Our Safety Score answers the question, “Is the current dividend payment safe?” We look at factors such as current and historical EPS and FCF payout ratios, debt levels, free cash flow generation, industry cyclicality, ROIC trends, and more. Scores of 50 are average, 75 or higher is very good, and 25 or lower is considered weak.
WM has one of the safest dividend payments that income investors can find. The company recorded a dividend Safety Score of 97, suggesting that its dividend is safer than 97% of all other dividend stocks in the market.
Over the last four quarters, WM’s earnings and free cash flow payout ratios were 66% and 56%, respectively. For such a stable and predictable company like WM, these ratios are healthy and appear to pose little risk.
Looking further back, we can see that WM’s payout ratios have increased a bit over the last decade, but not by an extraordinary amount. In most years, the company’s payout ratios remained between 40% and 60%, leaving WM with plenty of dividend cushion and room for incremental growth.
Besides payout ratios, it is important to assess how well a stock performed during the financial crisis. A “safe” payout ratio can suddenly appear dangerous if earnings are very sensitive to the broader economy.
Fortunately for WM, consumers and businesses still have to consume a variety of goods regardless of how the economy is doing. Trash is a hard expense to avoid. WM’s sales fell by 12% in 2009, reflecting lower trash volumes but still outperforming many other types of companies.
Importantly, WM’s stock actually gained 5% in 2008, beating the S&P 500 by 42% and reflecting its defensive characteristics.
Analyzing a company’s return on invested capital can help us understand whether or not it has a moat. As seen below, WM has consistently recorded high-single digit returns. In many ways, WM’s business is somewhat like a utility company in that it practically has a monopoly in many local markets due to its landfills and extensive asset network. Since it is so capital intensive, the result is moderate but predictable returns on capital.
WM has also been an excellent free cash flow generator. Free cash flow is the lifeblood of companies and allows them to reinvest and return capital to shareholders without requiring debt or issuing shares. WM is a free cash flow machine because of its long-lasting assets (e.g. landfills, truck fleets), customer contracts, and route density.
A company’s balance sheet can also impact the safety of a dividend payment. Companies with too much debt could unexpectedly fall on hard times and need to suspend their dividend in order to service their debt.
WM maintains significantly more debt than the average company. Its assets are capital-intensive, but the company’s consistent free cash flow generation reduces its credit risk significantly. WM also has over $1.4 billion in unused and available credit capacity, and the company has noted that only 8% of its total debt portfolio has floating interest rates in case rates finally do start to rise.
Dividend Growth Score
Our Growth Score answers the question, “How fast is the dividend likely to grow?” It considers many of the same fundamental factors as the Safety Score but places more weight on growth-centric metrics like sales and earnings growth and payout ratios. Scores of 50 are average, 75 or higher is very good, and 25 or lower is considered weak.
WM’s dividend Growth Score is a little below average at 43. While the company has consistently increased its cash flow generation and dividend, it operates in mature, slow-growing markets. The company’s payout ratio is also north of 55%, which is still healthy but provides a bit less room for dividend growth than many other companies, especially considering the amount of debt on the balance sheet.
WM increased its dividend by 6.5% in December, making its thirteenth consecutive year of dividend increases. While it is only about halfway to joining the list of dividend aristocrats, WM has the predictable and durable business model needed to keep chugging along.
As seen below, WM’s dividend growth had been decelerating over the past decade until its announced increase earlier this month. We expect low- to mid-single digit dividend growth to continue, essentially matching the company’s earnings growth rate.
WM trades at 19.6x estimated 2016 earnings and offers a dividend yield of 2.8%, which is significantly below its five year average dividend yield of 3.6%.
With an expected long-term earnings growth rate in the low- to mid-single digits, we believe the stock offers total return potential of 6% to 9% per year.
WM doesn’t appear to be a bargain for new money today, but we think the company’s impressive durability and moat make it worth holding onto – especially for investors living off dividends in retirement.
We expect to be rewarded with steadily improving earnings and growing dividend payments for years to come.
WM is a rock solid business. The company’s economies of scale, extensive network of well-placed assets, ownership of increasingly-rare landfills, annuity-like revenues (the average commercial and industrial customer stays with WM for 10+ years), and disciplined approach to capital allocation create a strong fundamental case to buy and hold WM forever. It’s no wonder why Bill Gates’ trust has made WM its third largest holding and also owns about 25% of WM’s next largest competitor, Republic Services (RSG).
We expect WM to continue improving its profitability over the coming years and rewarding shareholders with additional, albeit modest, dividend increases. For these reasons and more, we own WM in our Conservative Retirees dividend portfolio and don’t plan on selling anytime soon.
You’re right about this being a company that’s not too well known by the DGI community. I’ve never heard of it myself; I always thought trash collection was just handled by city governments.
Certainly a solid company with services that will always be necessary no matter the economy or level of technology that we have. Technologies come and go, but we’ll always have trash to through out (such as the packages those technological gadgets come in, and DivHut write a nice post about THOSE companies to awhile back on his site).
The only issue I have with them at present is simply the fact that they are slightly expensive. I prefer to buy companies with a P/E of 20 or under, which is not what we have right now. I’d also prefer to see a little more growth for a company yielding less than 3%. Not to sound like a speculative yield chaser who only buys royalty trusts, but I would actually prefer to sacrifice a LITTLE (very little) of that safety for some growth. A safe dividend won’t mean anything without the growth necessary to make a positive impact on your financial future, right?
Still, thanks for cluing me in on its stock. Whereas earlier I’ve never heard of it, I’m going to be watching this hidden gem very closely.
ARB–Angry Retail Banker
Thanks for your thoughtful comment. I agree that a pullback would make WM more appealing today, although I feel like I have been saying that about almost every defensive stock these days! It was a nice surprise to see WM’s 6.5% dividend hike in December, but you’re right – sustainable dividend growth for this type of company is likely to remain in the low-single digits. I’m glad you found the article helpful, and best of luck with your investing in 2016.
I also like to purchase companies at no more than 20x earnings, particularly if growth opportunities appear more limited (like they arguably do for WM). Still, WM does seem to be a “sleep well at night” stock if you can get it on a pullback. Thanks for sharing some of your thoughts!
First of all, thanks for all the great analysis on your site. It is much appreciated. Now for my assessment of WM.
Just looking at the numbers, it is hard to see much to like about WM. Over the past 10 years, the price has gone from ~30 to ~53. Not stellar but not bad. The problem is with the underlying factors that have led to this increase. To start with, the revenue over this period has remained flat at 13B. Net income has also barely budged over this period holding steady at about 1B. So the only factors to account for WM’s price appreciation is a PE which has gone from 16 to 23 and share buybacks which have reduced the share count about 15-20% and thereby increasing the EPS accordingly. A stock fueled by a rising PE and share buybacks without any increase in revenue or net earnings hardly seems like a compelling story even with a decent dividend history.
Thank you for leaving a very thoughtful comment. I am glad you are enjoying some of the analysis on the site.
You are right – it’s hard to argue that WM is a bargain at today’s price. Investors have been bidding up just about any stock with “safe” cash flows. Revenue is growing, but very slowly. Over the next few years, I think the story will be more about what management can do to squeeze more earnings out of the existing business via efficiency improvements (e.g. fleet technology) and portfolio management (e.g. $2 billion divestiture of waste-to-energy business in December 2014; recycling operations). I suspect that WM’s free cash flow generation could improve at a much faster rate than sale’s growth, but time will tell.
Thanks again for stopping by!