Philip Morris International (PM): A Popular High Dividend Stock for Retirement Portfolios

While it may surprise many investors, history has shown us that many of the best long-term investments aren’t hyper-growth companies but much more boring dividend growth machines.

 

For example, in the last 50 years Altria (MO), formerly Philip Morris, has been one of the best performing stocks on a total return basis, rising an incredible 6,648 fold.

 

Back in 2008, Altria spun off its faster growing international tobacco business into Philip Morris International (PM).

 

Since then, Philip Morris has increased its dividend for nine consecutive years, rewarding shareholders with 10.7% annualized dividend growth.

 

While this high-yield stock’s past performance has been remarkable, investing gains are not made by looking in the rearview mirror but instead based on forward cash flow growth.

 

Let’s take a closer look at Philip Morris International to see what kind of income growth and total returns shareholders can expect going forward and whether or not this dominant tobacco company is an appropriate stock for investors living off dividends in retirement.

 

Business Description

Philip Morris International is the world’s largest tobacco seller, with its 80,000 employees operating 48 production facilities in 32 countries.

 

It markets numerous cigarette brands to over 150 million customers in over 180 countries and has a 27.9% global market share (excluding China and the U.S.).

 

Philip Morris owns the international rights to all of Altria’s most famous brands, including Marlboro, Merit, Parliament, Virginia Slims., L&M, Philip Morris, Bond Street, Chesterfield, Lark, Muratti, Next, and Red & White.

 

In addition, the company has acquired numerous other foreign cigarette brands, including:

• Dji Sam Soe, Sampoerna, and U Mild (Indonesia)
• Champion, Fortune, and Hope (Philippines)
• Apollo-Soyuz and Optima (Russia)
• Morven Gold (Pakistan)
• Boston (Columbia)
• Belmont, Canadian Classics, and Number 7 (Canada)
• Best (Serbia)
• f6 (Germany)
• Delicados (Mexico)
• Assos (Greece)
• Petra (Czech Republic and Slovakia)

As you can see, Philip Morris International’s sales are pretty evenly diversified with the vast majority of sales coming from Europe and Asia.

 

However, the EU remains the company’s most profitable region by far, generating over 35% of the company’s total operating income in 2016.

 

Region	2016 Sales	% Of Sales	Operating Income	% Of Income
EU	$8.162 billion	30.6%	$3.994 billion	35.8%
Eastern Europe / Middle East / Africa	$7.000 billion	26.2%	$3.016 billion	27.1%
Asia	$8.681 billion	32.5%	$3.196 billion	28.7%
Latin America / Canada	$2.842 billion	10.7%	$938 million	8.4%
Total	$26.685 billion	100.0%	$11.144 billion	100%

Source: Philip Morris International Earnings Release

 

Business Analysis

Philip Morris International is an absolute giant in the global tobacco world.

 

The company is the market leader in seven of the 10 largest OECD countries by industry volume and is the second largest player in another two.

 

Outside of OECD countries, Philip Morris holds onto the number one market share spot in three of the 10 biggest countries by industry volume and is the number two player in another four.

 

The company’s dominance is driven by the strength of its brand portfolio. Philip Morris has six of the world’s top 15 cigarette brands, including the world’s number one brand – Marlboro.

 

As a result, the company enjoys excellent pricing power. Since 2008, Philip Morris’ annual average pricing gain has been 6%, excluding excise taxes.

 

Despite its strengths, Philip Morris International has run into some major growth headwinds in recent years, with sales and earnings grinding to a halt or even turning negative.

 

 

Part of this is due to lower cigarette volumes because smoking is an industry in secular decline.

 

In fact, Philip Morris reported that its cigarette shipment volume was down 4.1% in 2016 (although roughly 40% of the decline was due to Pakistan and the Philippines, where volume erosion was concentrated in low unit margin brands).

 

Most of its brands saw flat or negative declines in volumes, as did all regions (although volume in the EU was down just 0.5%). However, it’s important to note that Marlboro gained market share in the EU (+0.2%), Asia ex-China (+0.3%), and Latin America & Canada (+0.6%).

 

 

One of the reasons for the volume declines is higher government taxes in some of Philip Morris’ largest regions, such as the EU, Russia, and the Philippines (three of the company’s top four markets).

 

The EU implemented anti-smoking legislation in mid-2014, aiming to reduce tobacco consumption by 2% over the next five years, the equivalent of 2.4 million smokers. The EU has one of the highest excise tax rates on tobacco in the entire world, and roughly 70% of Philip Morris’ revenue from the region goes to the government.

 

In 2013, the Philippines raised excise taxes to boost the average price per cigarette pack by a whopping 48%. Annual excise taxes are expected to continue in the region through 2017 and beyond, putting more profits in the government’s coffers at the expense of Philip Morris’ bottom line.

 

Russia initiated a new law in 2013 that banned smoking in many public places and restricted advertising. Excise taxes in Russia have more than tripled the cost of a pack of cigarettes since 2006.

 

As you can see below, excise taxes have increased from 59.5% of Philip Morris’ revenue in 2012 to 64.4% in 2016, eroding its gross margins by 4%.

 

 

Interestingly enough, Altria’s excise taxes as a percentage of sales (24.9% in 2016) are less than half of Philip Morris’ and have decreased by four percentage points since 2012, boosting gross margins.

 

 

A somewhat more favorable outlook in the U.S., continued industry consolidation, and growth in reduced-risk products such as iQOS (more on that later) have led many investors to speculate that Altria and Philip Morris could merge.

 

Besides government policies, a major factor to the company’s slowing growth is the rising dollar, which means that sales in foreign currencies are reduced when they are converted to U.S. dollars for reporting purposes.

 

In 2016, Philip Morris’ negative currency effects on net revenue and earnings per share came in at a -4.8% and -10.4%, respectively.

 

Latin America especially was the scene of some brutal currency losses thanks to the ongoing recessions in Brazil, Venezuela, and other commodity dependent nations.

 

However, while operating margins have declining from 17.9% in 2012 to 14.4% last year, the company has managed to use aggressive cost cutting to maintain very impressive and far more stable returns on investor capital.

 

Better yet, in recent quarters the dollar has stopped its relentless march upwards, allowing margins, sales, and earnings to recover a bit.

 

A lot of this improvement has to do with Philip Morris’ wide moat, driven by the company’s excellent brands and pricing power.

 

This helps to keep revenues stable and hopefully growing despite the ongoing cigarette volume pressure caused by rising global anti-smoking sentiment.

 

In fact, the company’s pricing power is so strong that, if you exclude currency effects, its latest full-year results show positive revenue growth.

 

Meanwhile, management’s guidance for 2017 calls for adjusted EPS (excluding currency) growth of 9% to 12% – about in line with 2016’s adjusted EPS growth rate of 11.8%. Not bad at all for such a mature business.

 

However, while Philip Morris’ strong brand equity and pricing power makes for generally stable sales and margins (and makes for some very impressive free cash flow generation), the company’s overall profitability is actually a bit below industry average.

 

That’s a result of only Marlboro being a truly global brand, which limits the economies of scale it can deliver on its other brands, especially those limited to just one or two nations.

 

For comparison’s sake, Altria’s cigarette market share is 51.4%, nearly double Philip Morris’ thanks to its focus on just the U.S.

 

Still, I don’t think anyone can really complain about margins in excess of 20%.

 

Company	Operating Margin	Net Margin	FCF Margin	Return On Assets	Return On Equity	Return On Invested Capital
Philip Morris	38.7%	24.8%	25.8%	19.2%	NA	51%
Industry Average	46.6%	27.4%	NA	13.9%	155.6%	NA

Source: Morningstar

 

Management is also working hard to insulate itself away from the worst of the long-term decline in global smoking habits with its strong push into reduced-risk products, or RRPs.

 

Specifically, the company has invested $3 billion since 2008 into developing its IQOS heat stick (which doesn’t burn tobacco) and its MESH vaporizer technology (which creates a nicotine rich vapor with none of the carcinogenic chemicals found in tobacco).

 

 

While the actual percentage of sales from RRPs is still very low (4.9% of fourth quarter 2016 net revenues excluding excise taxes), the company has seen strong growth in IQOS, first in Japan (where it was initially tested and 20% of its customers have already switched) and also in other nations that it has recently launched the product.

 

As you can see below, HeatSticks saw their market share rise from 0.8% at the start of 2016 to 4.9% by the end of the year in Japan.

 

 

IQOS volume trends are rising around the world as well, and Philip Morris is investing in additional manufacturing capacity to meet demand. This is key to the company’s very long-term future:

 

 

A big plus for Philip Morris is that if IQOS can indeed become the dominant brand of future smoking alternatives, then its world class access to tobacco will give it large economies of scale.

 

That could allow it to maintain its strong profitability and returns on shareholder capital for many years to come.

 

It’s worth noting that the company submitted a product application for its IQOS product to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration at the end of 2016, which would open up a large market opportunity for Philip Morris (further fueling speculation of an Altria – Philip Morris reuniting).

 

Only time will tell whether or not Philip Morris’s customers will decide that “heat-not-burn” alternatives to traditional cigarettes are truly a fulfilling substitute, and more importantly whether they wish to continue using them or just use them as a tobacco cessation method.

 

However, the early traction is encouraging as Philip Morris looks to gradually shift its business from being a manufacturer of combustible tobacco products to an RRP-focused company.

 

Key Risks

There are three important risks to consider before investing in any tobacco stock, but Philip Morris in particular.

 

First, understand that the company has no exposure to the world’s largest smoking population, China (where 30% of global smokers reside).

 

While other developing economies like India are potential growth markets, the risk of governments becoming increasingly anti-tobacco due to rising global health costs is ever present.

 

 

In fact, in recent years, governments around the world have started to increasingly crack down on tobacco, including bans on marketing, steadily rising taxes that threaten to eventually price many people out of the market, and increasingly gruesome warning labels on packaging.

 

 

Such warning labels, as well as an increasing regulatory pressure for “plain packaging” that limits branding, is a threat to not just the company’s brand and thus wide moat, but research out of Australia indicates that it can have a noticeable decrease on smoking rates.

 

Finally, while RRPs like IQOS represent a necessary adaptation to the future realities of declining smoking rates worldwide, keep in mind that regulators around the globe have remained largely hostile to these smoking alternatives.

 

In other words, while reduced-risk products may help to slow the decline in product volume, they probably won’t be able to halt it entirely.

 

Continued price increases and financial engineering (i.e. reducing share count over time) will become increasingly important components of tobacco companies’ long-term investment thesis.

 

That’s because in an industry facing secular decline, however gradual the decline might be, a falling share count is necessary to help maintain EPS and FCF per share growth, the cornerstone of a safe and growing dividend.

 

However, Philip Morris International in particular has an issue of rising debt levels, as the company has taken on a lot of debt in recent years to fund its aggressive buybacks (2.1% CAGR over the last five years).

 

 

 

In a rising interest rate environment, the company could have to slow the pace of buybacks, which will make EPS, FCF per share, and dividend growth a bit harder to come by in the coming years.

 

If rising U.S. interest rates result in a further strengthening of the dollar, growth headwinds could intensify as well.

 

If the dollar ends up rallying, management’s 2017 earnings guidance may prove out of reach.

 

While currency fluctuations are unlikely to impact Philip Morris’ long-term earnings power, they could remain a headwind for the stock over the short to medium term.

 

Dividend Safety Analysis: Philip Morris International

We analyze 25+ years of dividend data and 10+ years of fundamental data to understand the safety and growth prospects of a dividend.

 

Our Dividend Safety Score answers the question, “Is the current dividend payment safe?” We look at some of the most important financial factors such as current and historical EPS and FCF payout ratios, debt levels, free cash flow generation, industry cyclicality, ROIC trends, and more.

 

Dividend Safety Scores range from 0 to 100, and conservative dividend investors should stick with firms that score at least 60. Since tracking the data, companies cutting their dividends had an average Dividend Safety Score below 20 at the time of their dividend reduction announcements.

 

 

We wrote a detailed analysis reviewing how Dividend Safety Scores are calculated, what their real-time track record has been, and how to use them for your portfolio here.

 

Philip Morris International has a Dividend Safety Score of 87, indicating that its dividend is very safe and dependable.

 

This is because the tobacco industry is generally seen as non-discretionary (i.e. “recession proof”) by its consumers, due to the addictive nature of the product.

 

As a result, Philip Morris International managed to grow its dividend even during the worst financial disaster since the great depression. The company’s sales fell by just 2% in 2009, and its free cash flow per share managed to grow.

 

 

In addition, up until recently Philip Morris has maintained a reasonably low payout ratio, leaving plenty of excess earnings and cash flow to provide a buffer to insulate the dividend against any unexpected declines in business.

 

 

However, be aware that due to the recent weakness in its results (mostly due to the stronger dollar), Philip Morris’ trailing 12 month EPS payout ratio is 92%.

 

If currency fluctuations are excluded, the company’s EPS payout ratio in 2016 was closer to 83% – still high, but not as alarming for a stable business such as Philip Morris.

 

The dividend remains secure, but it’s increasingly important that Philip Morris deliver on its guidance for 2017 and beyond despite some of the growth challenges previously discussed.

 

Of course, that doesn’t necessarily mean the dividend will become unsafe. After all, despite taking on a lot of debt to fund buybacks over the last few years, Philip Morris International still has a pretty strong balance sheet.

 

For example, with a current ratio above one and a high interest coverage ratio, the company has no trouble servicing either its debts or short-term liabilities.

 

 

Now admittedly Philip Morris has a more leveraged balance sheet than the average tobacco company. However, its strong pricing power and high FCF margin mean that the company retains a very strong credit rating and access to cheap debt.

 

Company	Debt / EBITDA	EBITDA / Interest	Debt / Capital	Current Ratio	S&P Credit Rating
Philip Morris	2.74	11.74	136%	1.16	A
Industry Average	1.96	NA	81%	1.16	NA

Source: Morningstar

 

In a worst case scenario, in which earnings and FCF were to decline and its dividend payout ratio rose above 100%, the company could very likely still afford to borrow for a year or two to keep the dividend alive and well.

 

Dividend Growth Analysis

Our Dividend Growth Score answers the question, “How fast is the dividend likely to grow?” It considers many of the same fundamental factors as the Safety Score but places more weight on growth-centric metrics like sales and earnings growth and payout ratios. Scores of 50 are average, 75 or higher is very good, and 25 or lower is considered weak.

 

Philip Morris International has a Dividend Growth Score of 33, indicating that investors can expect some pretty weak payout growth in the next few years.

 

That’s not surprising given the decelerating pace of dividend growth in the last few years. As a rising dollar and slowing sales growth has taken a toll on the payout ratios, which are now at the upper limits of sustainability, Philip Morris will need to greatly slow the pace of future dividend growth in order to increase its payout security.

 

As seen below, the company’s dividend growth has decelerated from 7.9% per year over the last five years to just a 2% raise in 2016.

 

While growth has been slow, it has been reliable. Philip Morris will join the Dividend Achievers list in 2018 after its 10^th consecutive year of raising dividends.

 

 

How fast could Philip Morris’ future dividend growth be? Analysts expect long-term sales growth of 4% to 5% (beyond 2017), driven entirely from rising prices.

 

In addition, cost cutting is expected to boost long-term operating ratios by 3% and allow for long-term EPS growth of 6%.

 

Considering the company’s high payout ratio and some of the growth headwinds potentially facing the business, Philip Morris investors probably shouldn’t expect dividend growth of more than 3% to 5% annually or so over the next decade.

 

Valuation

Over the past year, PM stock has returned 12%. While that is underperforming the S&P 500, which is up 20%, shares of this international tobacco blue chip don’t look cheap.

 

Based on management’s 2017 adjusted EPS guidance, Philip Morris stock trades at a forward P/E multiple of 19.9.

 

The stock’s 4.2% dividend yield is in line with its long-term median dividend yield (4.2%), according to data from Gurufocus.

 

While Philip Morris has excellent profitability, stable cash flow, and a very safe dividend payment today, its current valuation multiple seems a little steep based on some of the growth headwinds facing the business and its high debt load.

 

If Philip Morris is able to deliver long-term EPS growth of 5-6% per year, the stock appears to offer annual total return potential of about 9-10% per year (4.2% dividend yield plus 5-6% earnings growth).

 

A 10%+ pullback in the stock would make for a more interesting adding opportunity to consider.

 

Closing Thoughts on Philip Morris International

Assuming you are willing to overlook the secular decline of the tobacco industry as a whole, Philip Morris International has the potential to be a solid high-yield dividend growth investment for long-term investors.

 

I plan to continue holding the stock in our Conservative Retirees dividend portfolio, but income investors considering opening a position in Philip Morris International might be better off waiting for a more attractive price.